Bank of New York Mellon Chairman & CEO Robert Kelly: A CNBC Interview
That Confirms Top U.S. Banks Will Head the Custodianization
of Canada’s Financial Institutions
© 2009 Brad Kempo B.A. LL.B.
Barrister & Solicitor
Just how vile and perverse is Canada’s paradigm of governance is reflected in the steps the coalition intends to take. Deciding it’s absolutely necessary for the peace, security and prosperity of the 21st century that political and corporate governance structures, policies and practices be totally deconstructed and reconstituted and malfeasant parties if Chinada complicit go to prison for life or lengthy periods and the loyal have their employment and appointments terminated demonstrates the nature and seriousness of the threat.
Who would disagree with the proposition that an effective means of halting Chinada’s global hegemony motivated military posture is to force its principals into corporate insolvency and personal poverty? And that’s precisely what’s being planned. The precedent for the methodology of neutralizing totalitarian imperialism at its source the Reagan-Thatcher arms race. The Soviet Union’s economy was pushed until it imploded. For Canada’s part in the Beijing leadership’s nefarious trans-generationally implemented foreign policy, the coalition’s covert regime change will include seizing all major banks and imposing new policies and practices – ones that will serve the following purpose:
· expel executives who are complicit and loyal and installing the Custodian-in-Council’s interim appointees;
· take possession and control of all bank assets and conduct a full audit to determine to what extent the institution has been complicit in Chinese de facto governance, militarization, economy monopolization, wealth plundering and depraved indifference murder; and
· micro-manage the assets of customers who are complicit or loyal; including seizing and regulating corporate and personal bank accounts, unilaterally changing the terms of or calling in mortgages, lines of credit and credit cards.
Deprived of the ability to live in a residence, own a vehicle and have money to purchase food, the malfeasant will be reduced to the same level of the homelessness that they directly and indirectly caused to hundreds of thousands of Canadians.
The diplomacy archive includes these chapters and supplementals on the justice of this action:
· Adding Another Count to the Fiefdom Indictment
The diplomacy archive includes these supplementals on what the coalition has said on taking interim control of the country’s financial institutions:
· America’s Biggest Bankers and Congress Have a Geo-Political Message for Canada’s Rich and Powerful
· 60 Minutes: The Coalition Communicating Again Canada’s Banking System is Going to be Custodian-ized
During the dissemination initiative Canada’s financial institution association was contacted. The hostile and threatening reception was considered guilty conscience evidence of Chinada complicity and being involved in other culpability attracting behavior: The Canadian Bankers Association – Another Bastion of Economy Monopolization, Wealth Plundering and Chinese De Facto Governance and Militarization.
Another installment of diplomacy on this undertaking was during two CNBC-broadcast events. The first was a short press conference on December 14, 2009 held by three banking executives immediately after meeting with President Obama at the White House. The second was after this when the Bank of New York Chairman & CEO had a sit-down interview with CNBC. During both he employed the lexicon to underscore the coalition’s resolute determination to procure with the aid of America’s top banking experts a critical aspect of covert regime change – one designed to effectively address Canada’s systemic dysfunctionalities and effect a divorce full and final between the country’s elite and China’s leaders.
Richard Davis, US Bancorp Chairman & CEO, took the lead at the press conference; and they made it fully known there was discussion about the takeover of Canadian financial institutions.
Davis: We did the job of telling our story and working with the American public to make loans more affordable. And we did the job of telling our story about regulatory reform and how much that matters to all of us for the betterment of this great economy. And then finally we agreed very much in the principles of executive compensation and we are looking forward to seeing the efforts we've taken [0:19: Kelly: Terminator M.] in the last couple of months as companies report 2009 earnings.
[…]
Question: Where were the areas of greatest disagreement?
Davis: You know there wasn't a lot of disagreement [0:44: Kelly: Cl.M.]...
[...]
Question: What was his tone today? Was he irritated with you? Did he express anger?
Davis: The whole meeting was very productive. It was. We're in this together. [1:37: Brown M.] We understand that the bankers are not surprised by the response. We're paying attention to it. We're getting the same letters from small business owners who want more availability to credit. So for us it's a need to balance the risk and the reward; and in the times past it was easy for us to do what was right without everyone watching every step. [1:53: Kelly: Kernan M.]
[...]
The banks right now -- you don't want to make loans that are not strong and well suited for the consumer or for the small business. So we agree viscerally that more lending needs to be done [2:56: Kelly: Brown M.]. We're looking for...
[...]
You'll be very pleased to see [3:27: Bl.M.] we're probably more optimistic than the pundits might be [Bl.M.]. With that in mind we're putting in everything we can. It's [Clash of Civ. M.] the core to our engine.
Mr. Kelly indicates that all those in attendance, fully apprised of the geo-political threat, want to be involved in the interim takeovers because there is the need for protection from what China and Canada represent. And he trusts, although there are no absolute guarantees, that reforms they institute will prevent Canada from slipping back into militarized totalitarianism.
The banks in that room are, of course, the largest financial institutions. There's probably tens of thousands of people underneath those executives that are responsible for doing nothing other than lending money. It's core to their business. It's like going to a pizza shop and saying you want a pizza. You go into a bank, you want a loan, that's core to the business. [3:14: Cl.M.] And everyone wants to do lending.
[...]
They understand the importance of making loans; and also doing it for credit-worthy borrowers; and making sure we get the right regulatory reforms in place in a reasonable period of time that, essentially, we're never going to let this happen to us again [4:57: Cl.M.]. Does it guarantee it'll never happen again? No. But I think we can really reduce the odds of it.
[ …]
We have an old, antiquated system that could do a lot better for our country than what we have right now. We need some fundamental change that needs to happen; whether its [a] systemic risk regulator or too big to fail -- no one should be too big to fail. But we need a wind-up mechanism so we don't have something like a Lehman Brothers, for example in the future. [7:16: Z-J M.] And we also need to have consumer protection. We're all for that. So I think if you listed down every one of these proposals, I think there'd be eighty percent alignment that we're in agreement with the administration on the fundamental changes that have to be made.
